Officiating controversies have long been a part of the game in the National Football League. However, in recent years it seems that blown calls, questionable judgements, and inconsistent rule enforcement by referees have become more prominent and impactful. Fan frustration is at an all-time high, and many are calling for the league office to take action. But what exactly is the problem, and what can realistically be done to improve NFL officiating?
One need look no further than the most recent Super Bowl between the Kansas City Chiefs and Philadelphia Eagles for a prime example of a refereeing decision that directly impacted the outcome of the championship game. With just over 90 seconds left and the Chiefs facing 3rd down, Eagles cornerback James Bradberry was flagged for defensive holding on a pass breakup. Replays showed minimal contact that is rarely flagged at such a critical juncture, especially considering the officiating crew had gone nearly 600 straight snaps without calling that penalty all season. Yet the flag gave Kansas City a fresh set of downs, allowing them to drain the clock and kick a game-winning field goal.
Eagles fans were incensed, feeling the marginal call robbed their team of a likely Super Bowl victory. It hearkened back to the notorious "no-call" on an obvious pass interference that prevented the New Orleans Saints from likely winning the NFC Championship in January 2019. That non-call was so egregious it spurred major changes to the league's replay review system, allowing pass interference to be challenged by coaches. Yet three years later, another referee decision on a far less obvious penalty may have improperly tipped the scales in the sport's biggest game.
These recent controversial moments stand out, but questionable officiating has seemingly been on the rise for years. The outrage stems not only from isolated blown calls, but even more so from the inconsistencies, both within games and across the league. Standards seem to shift from crew to crew, quarter to quarter. Holdings and pass interferences are let go unflagged on one play, then overly scrutinized on another. Completions are ruled catches one week, incompletions the next. What is or isn't a catch still confuses fans and analysts alike. The frustrations boil over thanks to increased scrutiny; with HD instant replays and obsessive frame-by-frame analysis, errors once unseen are now magnified.
According to various surveys and studies in recent years, NFL officiating ranks bottom amongst the five major American professional sports leagues. College football officials are generally regarded as more competent. Why does the NFL, with all its resources and influence, continue to lag behind? There are a few key factors at play.
For one, the challenge of officiating professional football has increased exponentially in difficulty over the past couple decades. Rule changes aimed at improving player safety, such as prohibiting hits on defenseless receivers and low tackles on quarterbacks, require split-second judgment calls from referees on bang-bang plays. Given the speed and violence of pro football, expects mistakes to be made, but fans perceive the enforcement of these rules as wildly inconsistent and unfair. Pass interference, always a subjective call, is now challengedable, putting added scrutiny on a judgement referees used to have complete discretion on.
The league's convoluted and complex rulebook, with numerous contradictions and exceptions, certainly does not help. There are far simpler solutions for many rules issues, like instituting a college-style Targeting penalty for dangerous hits rather than trying to legislate various flavors of "defenseless receiver." Simplifying the catch rule to a version of "control, two feet, football move" would clear up years of confusion. Streamlining the rulebook in general would allow more consistent application. But the competition committee continues to layer on amendments and caveats, making the referees' jobs unnecessarily tricky.
The replay review system also remains flawed, as evidenced by the no-call controversy of 2019. While strides were made by making pass interference reviewable, there are still limitations on when and how replays can be used to get calls right. The referee has final say in many cases where video clearly contradicts the on-field call. All replay reviews should instead go to a central officiating command center with the best available technology and personnel. This would take the onus off the field officials. Coaches should also retain a challenge at least until a maximum number are proven wrong, to counter any mistakes made by replay officials. The technology exists to get every call correct - the league seems stubbornly resistant to implementing it fully.
Also undermining consistency is the lack of full-time officials. Currently the NFL only employs around 20 referees as full-timers, with around 110 more working part-time while holding other jobs. Critics say this leads to insufficient training and preparation time, while full-time officials could professionalize the role as in other leagues. There is merit to requiring referees to be properly focused year-round, though the league argues part-timers bring valuable perspective and experience from their other careers, typically law or law enforcement.
Perhaps the root of fans' frustration is the feeling that referees are not held accountable for mistakes. Coaches and players face media scrutiny, public criticism, and fines for their blunders, but referees mostly escape consequence thanks to protection from the league. There is little transparency in the grading process, and explanations of controversial calls from the league office often seem aloof and tone deaf. Meanwhile, refs perceived as more error prone continue getting prime assignments.
While complete perfection is an unreasonable goal, there are ways the NFL could inspire more confidence in their officiating competence and impartiality. Full-time status, simplified rules, advanced replay, and public accountability measures would go a long way towards minimizing blown calls and perceived bias. But this also requires a culture change within the famously insular and at times stubborn league office.
As it stands, controversies around NFL officiating seem poised to continue unabated into next season and beyond. But the boiling frustration of players, coaches and fans will soon force substantial changes upon the league. The very integrity of the games hangs in the balance. As more championship legacies are shaped by questionable referee decisions, public pressure will overwhelm any resistance by the NFL to modernizing and revamping its antiquated approach towards managing the officials. The future credibility of the sport depends upon it.
Comments